BLOG POST

How the CMO Role Has Evolved — and Why It’s Not Disappearing

Over the past 25 years, marketing has undergone one of the most profound transformations of any business function. What began as a digital disruption in the early 2000s has evolved into an era defined by data saturation, AI acceleration and radical shifts in how people discover, trust and engage with brands. 

Along the way, the role of the Chief Marketing Officer has expanded, fractured and — yes! — grown more strategic, not less.

The 2000s: Digital Disruption and Relationship Awakening

In the early 2000s, marketers found themselves on unfamiliar ground. The digital revolution rewired how companies and customers related to one another. Social platforms were emerging, peer-to-peer influence was growing, and customers increasingly trusted one another more than brand messages. Marketers had to manage omnichannel communications for the first time while responding to both praise and criticism in public forums.

This era also marked the rapid spread of the CMO title, though not always with clarity. In many organizations, “CMO” referred to a senior brand or communications executive rather than a true business strategist. The role lacked standard definition, even as marketing’s scope expanded.

The backdrop was turbulent. In 2001 alone, the dot-com bubble burst, Enron collapsed, the 9/11 attacks reshaped geopolitics, and the U.S. entered recession. Global marketing spend fell to $481 billion, the steepest decline in two decades. Technology was primitive by today’s standards: just 400 million mobile phones globally, mostly dial-up internet, and only 3.5 million social media users across platforms like Six Degrees and Ryze. Nvidia, worth $2 billion at the time, shared the year with Steven Spielberg’s eerily prophetic film A.I. Artificial Intelligence.

The 2010s: Data, AI and the Rise of the Strategic CMO

By the 2010s, marketing entered its data-intensive phase. Big data and early AI flooded teams with information, shifting the discipline from telling and selling to engagement, dialogue, and personalization. CMOs were no longer expected to simply build brands; they were tasked with applying insights to business problems, validating decisions with data, orchestrating seamless customer experiences, and embedding customer-centricity across the enterprise.

Most CMOs now reported directly to CEOs and sat on executive committees. But success brought complexity. As responsibilities expanded, confusion followed. Was the CMO a growth driver, a customer advocate, a brand steward, or all three? This ambiguity fueled experimentation with new titles, such as Chief Customer Officer, Chief Customer Experience Officer and Chief Growth Officer, reflecting marketing’s growing influence beyond communications.

2001 vs. 2025: A Radically Different Landscape

The contrast between 2001 and 2025 is staggering. Global marketing spend is projected to reach $1.14 trillion by 2026, with roughly 75% allocated to digital advertising. There are now 7.49 billion mobile phones in use and nearly 6 billion people online. Social media users have surged to 5.25 billion globally.

Media, however, has fragmented and consolidated at the same time. In 2001, the U.S. had more than 13,500 radio stations, 1,400 daily newspapers, and thousands of emerging online outlets. Today, the U.S. has roughly 8,000 active local news outlets, with more than 130 newspapers shutting down in 2025 alone. Ownership is concentrated among a handful of conglomerates — Comcast, Disney, Warner Bros. Discovery, and Paramount — while news consumption has shifted decisively to digital and social platforms.

Social media has now overtaken television as a primary news source for many Americans. Twenty-one percent of Americans (37% of those under 30) get news from influencers. Platforms like YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, WhatsApp, X and Facebook each reach more than 10% of the global population weekly with news content. For marketers, this means navigating a fragmented, algorithm-driven attention economy unlike anything seen before.

The CMO Role: Shrinking Title, Expanding Influence

Against this backdrop, headlines about the “decline” of the CMO role are misleading. Yes, the number of new CMO titles is down. Russell Reynolds reports 1,215 CMOs appointed globally in 2024, down from 1,297 the year before. LinkedIn data shows a 47% drop in CMO job postings year over year.

But this is not extinction — it is evolution.

Spencer Stuart’s 2025 CMO Tenure Study shows CMOs average 4.3 years in role, slightly less than the broader C-suite. Crucially, most departing CMOs are promoted internally or move into lateral or step-up roles elsewhere. Ten percent go on to become CEOs. That is not a failure rate; it is a leadership pipeline.

What’s changing is structure. Forrester data shows that CMO presence varies by industry, from 91% in financial services to just 21% in energy and mining. Meanwhile, organizations are distributing marketing leadership across titles like Chief Growth Officer, Chief Brand and Analytics Officer, and Chief Marketing and Communications Officer. Marketing leadership is becoming more integrated, more analytical, and more commercially accountable.

Marketing has moved from managing messages to shaping growth, trust and customer relationships in an AI- and platform-mediated world. The tools, channels and expectations have changed dramatically since 2001 but the strategic importance of marketing has only increased.

The CMO title may be evolving, but the mandate is clear: navigate complexity, orchestrate insight-driven growth, and lead in an era where attention, trust and relevance are the scarcest resources of all.